By Subhash K. Jha. Maharashtra, India, 09:00 AM IST
Indian movie director Priyadarshan has joined the bandwagon in slamming Danny Boyle's underdog saga 'Slumdog Millionaire' and has called the film a 'cheap trashy mediocre version' of erstwhile Bollywood hits.
' 'Slumdog Millionaire' is nothing but a cheap trashy mediocre version of those commercial films about estranged brothers and childhood sweethearts that Salim-Javed used to write so brilliantly in the 1970s. And please quote me clearly on this. If the Golden Globe and Oscars committees have chosen to honour this trashy film it just shows their ignorance of world cinema,' Priyadarshan told IANS.
Priyadarshan, whose much-acclaimed film on the silk weavers of Kanjeevaram was shown alongside Boyle's film at the Toronto Film Festival last year, feels Indians are exercising prideful property rights over a film that denigrates Mumbai.
'I saw the film with a mixed audience at the Toronto Film Festival. The Westerners loved it. All the Indian hated it. The West loves to see us as a wasteland, filled with horror stories of exploitation and degradation. But is that all there's to our beautiful city of Mumbai?'
He is surprised that Mumbai is celebrating a film that shows only the city's underbelly.
'Why are we taking this treatment? Just because a white man has made 'Slumdog Millionaire', we're so happy with it? I've read Vikas Swarup's novel 'Q and amp;A'. It should have been made by Mani Ratnam. Then you'd have seen what he would have done with Mumbai.'
The angry director wonders why there isn't a single shot in 'Slumdog...' that shows the more aesthetic side of Mumbai?
'Why has Danny Boyle not taken one shot of Marine Drive? Do his slumdwellers exist only within their slums? And look at the absurdities...A boy becomes a national hero on a game show. One cop takes him under arrest and interrogates him relentlessly. Where is everyone else? Is this kind of confinement possible in this day and age when television cameras enter your bedroom? If one of our filmmakers had made the same film we would have blasted him out of business.'
'Let them give as many Oscars as they like. We don't need to be impressed,' ends Priydarshan angrily.
Most Recent Comments
The original story by Vikas Swaroop, is absolutely brilliant and so is the acting by the children (not the teenagers or the adults). The above are the only good things and worthy of awards. In all honesty the Screen-play is an affront and insult to every Indian and the Hindu and the Muslim Religions alike. The children have been treated like an attraction in a Zoo (come and photograph them, expoit them-they will be here hundred years from now,) that is the attitude of the Producers,the Director and the Screen-writer. It has cost the Producers more to rent a tuxedo than what they have paid these incredible child actors who are back in the Slum-for the next Film Maker to photograph them,insult them,and exploite them. It costs fifty rupees a day to feed a child. When they are fed they will be able to work and cloth themselves and get their family out of the slums and the slums will disapear. The Producers should give back every cent in profit to the feed the children-anything else is a criminal exploitation.
View all comments »