India Wednesday, September 16, 2009

Verdict reserved on status of parliament's first meeting

From correspondents in Delhi, India, 09:01 PM IST

The Supreme Court Wednesday reserved its verdict on a lawsuit asking if parliament's first meeting each year should also be considered its first session, requiring the president's address.

A constitution bench headed by Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan reserved the verdict after a brief hearing on a lawsuit by Republican party of India-Athawale (RPI-A) chief Ramdas Athawale.

The lawsuit, filed in 2004, had questioned the erstwhile Lok Sabha speaker to treat the first meeting of the house in January 2004 as the continuation of the winter session which was adjourned sine die Dec 23, 2003.

Athawale had contended that though the winter session was adjourned, it cannot be termed as continuation when it met for the first time in the new year.

He had contended that the first meeting of the house any year has to be considered its first session of parliament requiring the president's address to both houses.

The bench, which also included Justice S.H. Kapadia, Justice R.V. Raveendran, Justice B. Sudershan Reddy and Justice P. Sathasivam, concluded the hearing of the issue in half an hour.

'There is a difference between adjourning the proceedings of the house and to prorogue the house,' the bench said, adding that only when the house is prorogued, parliament takes the assent from the president to commence proceedings.

When the house is merely adjourned, the speaker himself or herself issues notices to the members to start the session again, the bench added.

Attorney General G.E. Vahanvati sought dismissal of the matter saying that the lawsuit had no merit. He said the speaker had decided the issue in 2004 itself.

He termed as 'absurd' the RPI-A leader's contention that the first meeting of the house each year should be treated as the first session of every year.

But, Athawale's counsel H.K. Puri said Article 87 of the constitution says that the first session of the house each year has to be addressed by the president and the expressions of the Article needs to be given a meaning.

Add to Google Add to My Yahoo! Subscribe with Live.com

Most Recent Comments

  • Be the first to comment...