Politics Friday, August 22, 2008

Sex, morals and controversy dog Kerala's adolescent education plan

By T.G. Biju. Kerala, India, 09:00 AM IST

A fresh controversy is brewing in Kerala as the state government gets set to introduce the Adolescent Education Programme in schools. Religious groups and opposition politicians are still not prepared to accept the programme's handbook despite a revision, alleging it will lead to 'sexual anarchy'.

'The curriculum committee has approved the revised version of the Unicef handbook prepared by an expert committee. The book will be released in a month,' curriculum committee member A.K. Chandran told IANS.

The state government led by the Communist Party of India-Marxist appointed the committee following opposition from student organisations and minority religious organisations over the alleged 'pornographic type' pictures and offensive language in the original version of the Unicef handbook published last year.

The committee, which included psychologists, gynaecologists and other child educational experts, prepared the book omitting 'vulgar language' and retaining the essence of the original book, said Chandran, who is also a leader of the pro-CPI-M Kerala School Teachers Association (KSTA).

The project is a joint initiative of the Ministry of Human Resource Development, Unicef and the National AIDS Control Organisation.

But Inter Church Council spokesman Philip Nelpuraparambil said the church would not accept the handbook if it wasn't backed by moral teaching.

'Sex is a sacred thing. It is not simply biological. It is closely related to society, family and religion. So firstly morality should be taught. Otherwise it will create sexual anarchy in the state,' he told IANS.

Strongly rejecting the Church's view, Chandran said: 'The book has nothing to do with moral teaching. It is not a pornographic book. It teaches just science - the physical and mental changes taking place in teenagers.'

The book would be used in Classes 9 to 12. Women teachers would teach girls and men teachers the boys, Chandran added.

The government would hold talks with representatives of school managements before introducing the book, he said.

P.C. Vishnunath, former president of the Congress- affiliated Kerala Students Union (KSU), said he had seen the revised version of the book and it was a repetition of the 'old controversial book'.

Vishnunath, who is also a member of the state legislature, said: 'Teaching subjects including 'sexual intercourse' in class is very awkward for everyone.'

While emphasising the need for introduction of adolescent education in schools and saying that adolescent education is not sex education, former education minister E.T. Mohammad Basheer accused the state government of creating 'unnecessary controversy' in all matters related to education.

'Our education department is responsible for this mess,' he said.

K.K. Rajesh, general secretary of the Students Federation of India (SFI), the students' wing of the CPI-M, said the Adolescent Education Programme should be immediately introduced in schools in the state.

'Some communal forces are trying to create hindrance in the path of Kerala's social and educational development,' said Rajesh.

Add to Google Add to My Yahoo! Subscribe with Live.com

Most Recent Comments

  • Usha Khanna Friday, August 22, 2008

    Evidently the objections to the very principle of imparting sexual education at least as it is designed by 'experts' is widespread. The idea is West inspired. IT is as though we cannot do anything unless there is a parallel in the West, or everything that is accepted there should be thrust on us with some nice specious arguments of the experts with political backup. The truth is, such education has not helped in promoting healthy morals,but it has only added to the permissiveness already propagated by the cinema, Tv and other media.

  • MMK Rao and Muthukaruppan Friday, August 22, 2008

    The East has a responsibility toward brethren in the other half, and teach sex as a divine principle, not as a commodity produced with technology,that can wipe out an entire society if viewed in wrong perspective.The UNICEF group of people who made the original version apparently wrote it under predetermined terms, and to be workable,two separate books by true representative groups from East and West must have been made.Indeed the East has a responsibility toward the brother half of West,if the latter will not adopt a selfwilled posture in this matter.






India eNews Exclusive