By Rajeev Ranjan Roy. Delhi, India, 01:33 PM IST
The controversial Sethusamudram ship channel to link India's eastern and western coasts to avoid a 785-km detour around Sri Lanka is expected to overshoot its October deadline, as petitions against it are still pending in courts and only 25 percent of the work has been completed, officials said here.
The Rs.242.7 billion ($6 billion) project aims to create a 167-km-long navigable channel to link the Gulf of Mannar with the Bay of Bengal via Adam's Bridge, Palk Bay and Palk Strait between India and neighbouring Sri Lanka.
'As of now, nearly 25 percent physical progress has been achieved. Efforts are on to expedite the execution. But meeting the October deadline does not seem possible,' said a senior official in the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (S and amp;PI).
The ministry oversees the implementation of major central sector projects related to several fields like atomic energy, power, railways, shipping, roads and highways.
The Sethusamudram project was sanctioned in June 2005. It was the first major shipping infrastructure project Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's government sanctioned after assuming office in April 2004.
The Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport and Highways is implementing the project with the active participation of Tuticorin Port Trust (TPT).
'The delay was inevitable in view of several litigations in the Madras High Court and even the Supreme Court. Two precious years were lost in riding out all these hurdles,' the official, who requested anonymity, told IANS.
Said a senior official of Sethusamudram Corporation Ltd (SCL): 'The dredging is going on at the Palk Bay side. Whether the deadline is met or not depends upon the court's (Supreme Court) final verdict.'
'It is a good project, and will help the country in furthering trade interests. We will save a lot of time, energy and money once the channel gets operational,' the official told IANS on phone from Chennai.
At present ships cannot use the channel, partly because of the sand stone reef called Adam's bridge at Pamban, near Rameswaram, where the depth of the sea is hardly 11 feet.
When completed, the channel will save nearly 424 nautical miles or 785 km and around 30 hours of sailing time for ships navigating between India's east and west coasts.
The project ran into controversy soon after the central government decided to start the work with several organisations including the country's main opposition Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) opposing the channel.
They claimed that the channel would destroy the bridge now called Adam's Bridge. The epic Ramayana says the bridge was built by the army of Lord Ram on its way to Lanka for the battle with Ravan and the rescue of Sita.
The project has also raised the hackles of some environmentalists who say the shoals form a unique ecosystem that will be destroyed by the dredging, while the sand being dredged from the spot and being dumped in the seabed elsewhere will also destroy a lot of marine life.
The centre has, however, in an affidavit to the Supreme Court termed the opposition to the project as 'misconceived' and 'unsubstantiated' and asked the court to 'refrain from interdicting'.



Most Recent Comments
From the various news of the chequered story of this project including public petitions, the question now cannot be about missing of deadlines, but about the very basic concept of the project, its desirability and utility for the nation. Focussing on deadlines missed is a clever diversion from this truth. The project may benefit some interested politicians through operation, maintnenance and project construction, but nothing more.
The public smell rats reading these colossal figures at tax payer cost. We need objective details for study like (sub/sub-sub)contractors, project parts allotted with budget and actuals paid.etc.
In retrospect BJP was wrong in highlighting Ramayan facts. This has been misused by Mr TR Baalu and his officers as dictated by him. There are so many crucial technoeconomic criteria which fail this project.
Is the ministry trying to run roughsod over all the wisdom of these respectable with rich experience in shipping economics, techtonics, environment,and other relevant areas.They have presented impeccably sound arguments based on facts that nullify the claimed benefits of the project to the country.
The shipping ministry apparently has tried to oversimplify the issue by asking the SC not to interdict in it saying that the opposition to the project is misconceived/ unsubstantiated. The truth is that many experts have raised their voices against it.
View all comments »